An internal document that allegedly circulated within the Pentagon has sparked serious reactions in diplomatic circles after it outlined possible ways the United States could pressure NATO allies that, according to Washington’s assessment, did not provide sufficient support in military operations against Iran.
According to a U.S. official , the email analyzed various political and security measures, including highly sensitive proposals such as temporarily excluding certain member states from key roles within NATO and even taking symbolic steps with significant political impact.
At the center of Washington’s dissatisfaction is the issue of access, basing, and overflight arrangements (ABO agreements), considered crucial for U.S. operations. The document reportedly stresses that such cooperation is a “fundamental pillar of NATO,” but notes that some allies have shown reluctance to provide it.
One of the most drastic ideas mentioned is the possibility of suspending certain countries from prestigious roles within the alliance, moves that would have limited operational impact but strong political weight and messaging.
In the broader context, U.S. President Donald Trump sharply criticized the lack of engagement from some European allies, particularly regarding maritime activities linked to securing the Strait of Hormuz after the escalation of the conflict on February 28. He again raised questions about the future of U.S. participation in NATO, leaving the impression that Washington does not rule out that option.
Although the document does not foresee specific base closures in Europe, it does not exclude broader changes to the U.S. military presence, further increasing uncertainty among allies.
Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson stated that the U.S. administration expects greater engagement from allies and aims to ensure “credible options” to protect American interests and fairness within the alliance.
Meanwhile, diplomatic reactions are intensifying, particularly due to the positions of some European countries, such as Spain, which have restricted the use of their infrastructure for potential strikes, deepening divisions over the level of involvement in operations against Iran.
