The United States is reportedly introducing stricter interview procedures for people applying for non-immigrant visas, as part of broader efforts to strengthen security checks and prevent possible misuse of the asylum system.
According to a diplomatic instruction sent to US embassies and consulates, consular officers have been directed to ask applicants two specific questions during visa interviews: whether they have suffered harm or abuse in their home country, and whether they fear such treatment if they return.
The major change is that a “no” answer to both questions is now expected in order for the visa process to move forward. The instruction applies to all non-immigrant visa categories, including tourist, student and temporary work visas.
US officials say the purpose of the measure is to identify cases in which applicants may be hiding their real intention for travel. The concern is that some individuals could enter the United States on a temporary visa and later seek asylum after arrival.
The move comes as Washington has already been tightening checks on international students and reviewing certain immigration procedures under expanded security criteria. In recent months, additional measures have also reportedly affected the processing of visas from a number of countries.
The State Department maintains that US consulates play an important role in protecting national security and that every application is assessed individually under American law.
However, migration policy experts warn that the new approach could place applicants in a difficult and sensitive position. They argue that questions related to fear, abuse or personal safety may have serious consequences for people who are genuinely vulnerable.
Critics also caution that making legal travel more difficult could push some people toward riskier and less regulated routes if they believe the official visa process is no longer accessible.
For applicants, the new procedure signals a tougher environment for US visa interviews, where answers may now carry even greater weight in determining whether they are allowed to continue the process.
